Background: Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasm (PEComa) is a rare mesenchymal tumor. Gynecological PEComas account for just over one-fourth of the overall PEComa cases reported in the literature. Surgery is the most recommended primary treatment while adjuvant therapy is generally reserved for high-risk cases. However, the best management of this neoplasia has not been well established, primarily because of the paucity of cases described to date. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review is to summarize what is known thus far regarding the etiopathogenesis, clinical and pathologic features of PEComas, focusing also on the most valid treatment options for uterine cases. Data sources: Pubmed articles on PEComas published in various journals over the past 70 years were analyzed. Conclusions and key findings: Although the optimal treatment of gynecological PEComas is controversial, surgical resection remains the cornerstone. The use of adjuvant treatment is warranted in high risk patients to increase disease control. A multidisciplinary approach should be key in treatment decisionmaking regarding gynecological PEComas.

Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasm (PEComa) of the uterus: a systematic review / Musella, Angela; DE FELICE, Francesca; Kyriacou, A. Kyriacos; Barletta, Francesco; DI MATTEO, Filippo Maria; Marchetti, Claudia; Izzo, Luciano; Monti, Marco; BENEDETTI PANICI, Pierluigi; Redler, Adriano; D'Andrea, Vito. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY. - ISSN 1743-9191. - STAMPA. - 19:(2015), pp. 1-5. [10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.05.002]

Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasm (PEComa) of the uterus: a systematic review

MUSELLA, ANGELA
Primo
;
DE FELICE, FRANCESCA
Secondo
;
DI MATTEO, Filippo Maria;MARCHETTI, CLAUDIA;IZZO, Luciano;MONTI, Marco;BENEDETTI PANICI, PIERLUIGI;REDLER, Adriano;D'ANDREA, Vito
Ultimo
2015

Abstract

Background: Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasm (PEComa) is a rare mesenchymal tumor. Gynecological PEComas account for just over one-fourth of the overall PEComa cases reported in the literature. Surgery is the most recommended primary treatment while adjuvant therapy is generally reserved for high-risk cases. However, the best management of this neoplasia has not been well established, primarily because of the paucity of cases described to date. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review is to summarize what is known thus far regarding the etiopathogenesis, clinical and pathologic features of PEComas, focusing also on the most valid treatment options for uterine cases. Data sources: Pubmed articles on PEComas published in various journals over the past 70 years were analyzed. Conclusions and key findings: Although the optimal treatment of gynecological PEComas is controversial, surgical resection remains the cornerstone. The use of adjuvant treatment is warranted in high risk patients to increase disease control. A multidisciplinary approach should be key in treatment decisionmaking regarding gynecological PEComas.
2015
gynecological; neoplasm; PEComa; perivascular epithelioid cell; uterus; combined modality therapy; diagnosis, differential; female; humans; perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms; uterine neoplasms; surgery; medicine (all)
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01g Articolo di rassegna (Review)
Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasm (PEComa) of the uterus: a systematic review / Musella, Angela; DE FELICE, Francesca; Kyriacou, A. Kyriacos; Barletta, Francesco; DI MATTEO, Filippo Maria; Marchetti, Claudia; Izzo, Luciano; Monti, Marco; BENEDETTI PANICI, Pierluigi; Redler, Adriano; D'Andrea, Vito. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY. - ISSN 1743-9191. - STAMPA. - 19:(2015), pp. 1-5. [10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.05.002]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Musella_Perivascular_2015.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 248.14 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
248.14 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/906365
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 26
  • Scopus 59
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 51
social impact